
A new study from the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI) in Braunschweig, led by Prof. Till Strowig, challenges the long-standing notion that dietary fiber universally influences gut microbiomes. The research indicates that the effects of dietary fibers depend on the existing microbial community, suggesting that fiber's impact is more complex than previously thought.
Read More
Published in Nature Microbiology, the study addresses a significant question in human microbiome research. It has been observed that industrialized populations often have a dominance of the bacterial family Bacteroidaceae, while non-industrialized groups are predominantly associated with Prevotellaceae, including the species Segatella copri. Previous theories proposed that a plant-rich diet could explain these differences, but the study finds that diet alone cannot account for the observed patterns.
Dr. Caroline Tawk, a primary author of the study, explained that the research aimed to uncover the factors influencing competition among gut bacteria. With support from both HZI and EMBL, Tawk developed an experimental setup that allowed a comprehensive examination of various dietary components, enabling the evaluation of how these nutrients interact within a complex bacterial community.
The team constructed a simplified model of human gut bacteria, consisting of 21 species, and tested 94 dietary components, focusing on complex carbohydrates and vitamins. They discovered that over half of the tested components promoted the growth of S. copri. However, the assumption that plant carbohydrates favor Prevotellaceae over Bacteroidaceae was challenged when examining a specific carbohydrate, arabinan.
Despite S. copri's ability to utilize arabinan, other members of Bacteroidaceae could also do so, indicating that mere access to this substrate could not explain S. copri's competitive advantage. The team found that only in the presence of Escherichia coli, a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae, did S. copri thrive, revealing the significance of bacterial interactions.
Interestingly, even E. coli strains that could not metabolize the sugars released from arabinan supported S. copri's growth, suggesting that these sugars might act as signaling molecules that alter competitive dynamics among gut bacteria, rather than merely serving as nutrients.
To verify these findings in real-world scenarios, the HZI team collaborated with researchers from the University of Trento to analyze microbiome data from approximately 1,000 healthy adults. Results showed that both S. copri and Enterobacteriaceae were more diverse and prevalent in non-industrialized populations. Furthermore, a higher variety of Enterobacteriaceae correlated with an increased proportion of S. copri, supporting the laboratory findings and pointing to the broader implications of these interactions.
This research helps clarify why interventions like fiber supplementation or probiotics yield varying results among individuals. The findings imply that a dietary component's effects cannot be understood in isolation from the existing bacterial community, highlighting the necessity of considering an individual's unique gut microbiome when assessing dietary impacts.
Strowig cautions that future studies should aim to identify the mechanisms behind these interactions, potentially providing insights into personalized nutrition strategies aimed at shaping gut bacteria for better health outcomes. The study was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and other funding bodies, emphasizing the critical role of microbial context in the gut.